Ankle replacement-Revision using Wright Invision Ankle replacement system
Subscribe to get full access to this operation and the extensive Foot Surgery Atlas.
Learn the Ankle replacement-Revision using Wright Invision Ankle replacement system surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Ankle replacement-Revision using Wright Invision Ankle replacement system surgical procedure.
With increasing numbers of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) operations being carried out worldwide it can be expected that we are going to encounter more frequent and probably more complex failure situations. Failure of ankle replacements occurs due to a variety of causes and some risks for early failure have been established in the literature (Gadd RJ, Barwick TW, Paling E, Davies MB, Blundell CM. Assessment of a three-grade classification of complications in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(5):434-437). In time it can be considered that wear will generate a cytokine response leading to implant migration and cyst formation. This mode of failure is more frequently seen in certain makes of TAA with the best know example being the now withdrawn AES system which generated massive osteolysis in some series (Kokkonen A, Ikavalko M, Tiihonen R, et al. High rate of osteolytic lesions in medium-term followup after the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Feb;32(2):168-75).
The origin of cysts and loosening has been widely debated. Rodriguez et al. (2010) hypothesized that cyst formation may be related to pump action leading to synovial inclusion. However Bonnin et al. (2011) felt that some of the cysts may have evolved from pre-existing arthritic cysts. Jacobs et al. (2006) hypothesized that cyst formation may be related to overwhelming of a local afferent transport mechanism with wear particles, resulting in an accumulation of wear particles in periprosthetic tissue. Finally repeatedly authors have failed to find significant wear particles in retrieval specimens from the cysts but some (Koivu et al) have found that there is a switching on of an inflammatory cascade concluding that there is an increased expression of ‘high-mobility group box 1’ receptor for advanced glycation end product and other ‘danger signals’ which could contribute to inflammation around the implants, multilocular cyst formation, and osteolysis in failed TAA implants
The Mobility TAA (DePuy) was launched in 2003 and was withdrawn in June 2014 . There have been no widespread publications of osteolysis though persistent medial pain is reported in some patients.
For failed TAA the options are to convert the arthroplasty to an arthrodesis which is an accepted technique. Bone graft is often used from the fibula, iliac crest, allograft or using bone substitutes in order to fill the resulting bone void from where the implant has been removed. If union occurs then pain relief will usually follow but so does stiffness. If the bone loss is significant then the subtalar joint will often also be sacrificed with even greater loss of motion and functional deficit. Preservation of the subtalar joint might be possible especially with grafting of the talar defect and with plating of the ankle joint if enough talus bone stock remains.
The alternative and in order to preserve motion is to convert the failed arthroplasty to a revision joint replacement. Specific equipment has now come on to the market to facilitate this. The most tried and tested of these is the InBone system from Wright Medical Technologies, USA. Early publications have been forthcoming (Devries, et al). This is a fixed point, jig driven system using image intensification throughout in order to position the revision replacement in a reliable orientation. The system has been added to in the Invision System which also gives metallic solutions to bone loss by use of bulkier tibial trays and talar domes and with the addition of a flat plate to the talus allowing bridging of cyst defects in the talus. The plate has augments which can be added to the plantar talar surface – though they are limited by their position.
Detailed is a complex case of revision of a Mobile bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty (De Puy Mobility which has failed due to cyst formation) to a fixed bearing Invision Total Ankle replacement. The case is complicated by bony deficiency of the talus and fracture of the medial malleolus both of which are treated and discussed during the case.
Author : Mr Chris Blundell FRCS (Tr & Orth)
Institution :The Northern general hospital ,Sheffield ,UK.
- Each operation and the questions associated become a named course in the CPD section
- The operative technique itself is read as a lesson as is any company implant information if this is being assessed.
- You’ll need to tick the box to confirm this has been done and can do this immediately if you have already read the op tech.
- The vast majority of operations have a 10-15 MCQ quiz covering all aspects of the decision making and the technique
- There are four possible answers of which one is correct (or on occasion more correct) than the others.
- There are additional quiz modules on the surgical steps, the implants and problem cases being added continually
- The course is completed once all the lessons are read and quizzes submitted and passed.
- On successful completion of each quiz you will receive validated CPD points that add to the certificate in your CPD folder.
- Your dashboard also will contain a record of the time you have spent logged onto and using the site.
- The timer suspends after 5 minutes though if there is no activity.
- When you restart you will resume at the same point in the module.
- Once you have completed each quiz you will need to feedback on the module first then click “submit” and your paper will be marked.
The pass mark is 75%.
- If you fall below this level you will be directed back to re-read the slides where you’ve tripped up.
- Once these have been read you can re-do just the questions you failed on.
- Once you have passed the quiz you can return at a future stage & resit .
- Operation Quiz – 1 CPD point
- Surgical steps Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
- Implants Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
- Problem case Quiz – 1/2 CPD point
One CPD point equates to one hour of academic activity
Welcome to the Professional Development question section. The objective of taking these tests is to demonstrate that you have understood all aspects of the assessment and management of patients requiring surgical intevention. On successful completion you will receive a certificate accredited by both the Royal College of Surgeons of both England and Edinburgh as well as the British Orthopaedic Association.
Our content is designed for both Surgeons in independent practice and Surgeons in training.