12:45

Conversion of Dynamic Hip Screw to Avantage Dual Mobility Cup (Zimmer-Biomet) and Proximal Femoral Replacement (METS, Stanmore) surgical technique

Overview

Subscribe to get full access to this operation and the extensive Hip Surgery Atlas.

SUBSCRIBE


Professional Guidelines Included

Learn the Conversion of Dynamic Hip Screw to Avantage Dual Mobility Cup (Zimmer-Biomet) and Proximal Femoral Replacement (METS, Stanmore) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Conversion of Dynamic Hip Screw to Avantage Dual Mobility Cup (Zimmer-Biomet) and Proximal Femoral Replacement (METS, Stanmore) surgical procedure.

 

The revision of a DHS to a total hip is not a straightforward operation in many cases. The x-rays can reveal the obvious challenges, for example a multiple fragmented femur and eroded acetabulum. However intra-operatively the surgeon should expect additional significant soft tissue issues such as widespread scarring and pericapsular thickening which provide their own issues with safe exposure and the subsequent surgical reconstruction.

Whilst most of the issues can be rectified intra-operatively, soft tissue impingement anteriorly, which predisposes to dislocation,  remains a risk.   The case demonstrated was specifically at high risk for dislocation due to a combination of scarring, potential articular impingement, external impingement (thigh on a significant “abdominal apron”) and poor muscle function. Therefore for the cup a dual mobility system was chosen which in my practice is the Avantage Dual Mobility Cemented cup (Zimmer-Biomet).

A number of increasingly extensive femoral options were considered ranging from a simple cemented femur, or an uncemented extended revision type stem through to a proximal femoral replacement. Although planning is essential, sometimes it is not possible to predict which option will be needed. X-rays do act as a guide but often it is the intra-operative findings which dictate the correct implant. A Surgeon undertaking this type of procedure in this type of patient should be able to use these three femoral options confidently as the situation dictates. Being rigid in implant choice and failure to change plans intra-operatively as required can lead to sub-optimal surgery.

The patient in this case suffered an extracapsular neck of femur fracture which was treated with a DHS. The initial fracture however was complex with loss of the medial wall and displacement of the lesser trochanter.  Reduction of the fracture was not fully achieved, which with time and mobility worsened, leaving this patient with a body mass index of over 50 in extreme pain and unable to mobilise.

The outcome of this type of surgery needs to be as reliable as possible (get it right ‘second time’) and the patient needs to be able to mobilise immediately and full weight bearing.

The following operation details the take down and conversion of a failed DHS to an Avantage Dual Mobility Cup (Zimmer-Biomet) and a Proximal Femoral Replacement (Stanmore).

Related surgical techniques that should be read in conjunction with this on OrthOracle are https://www.orthoracle.com/library/stryker-omega-dynamic-hip-screw-extra-capsular-neck-femur-fracture/

and

https://www.orthoracle.com/library/single-stage-revision-of-peri-prosthetic-hip-fracture-with-stanmore-femoral-endo-prosthesis-stryker-trident-constrained-acetabulum-stryker-and-utilising-the-zimmer-biomet-explant/

 

Author: Mr Andrew Gordon FRCS Tr & Orth.

Institution: The Northern general Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Feedback

  • Each operation and the questions associated become a named course in the CPD section
  • The operative technique itself is read as a lesson as is any company implant information if this is being assessed.
  • You’ll need to tick the box to confirm this has been done and can do this immediately if you have already read the op tech.
  • The vast majority of operations have a 10-15 MCQ quiz covering all aspects of the decision making and the technique
  • There are four possible answers of which one is correct (or on occasion more correct) than the others.
  • There are additional quiz modules on the surgical steps, the implants and problem cases being added continually
  • The course is completed once all the lessons are read and quizzes submitted and passed.
  • On successful completion of each quiz you will receive validated CPD points that add to the certificate in your CPD folder.
  • Your dashboard also will contain a record of the time you have spent logged onto and using the site.
  • The timer suspends after 5 minutes though if there is no activity.
  • When you restart you will resume at the same point in the module.
  • Once you have completed each quiz you will need to feedback on the module first then click “submit” and your paper will be marked.
    The pass mark is 75%.
  • If you fall below this level you will be directed back to re-read the slides where you’ve tripped up.
  • Once these have been read you can re-do just the questions you failed on.
  • Once you have passed the quiz you can return at a future stage & resit .

CPD Points:

  • Operation Quiz – 1 CPD point
  • Surgical steps Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
  • Implants Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
  • Problem case Quiz – 1/2 CPD point

One CPD point equates to one hour of academic activity

COURSE

Welcome to the Professional Development question section. The objective of taking these tests is to demonstrate that you have understood all aspects of the assessment and management of patients requiring surgical intevention. On successful completion you will receive a certificate accredited by both the Royal College of Surgeons of both England and Edinburgh as well as the British Orthopaedic Association.

Our content is designed for both Surgeons in independent practice and Surgeons in training.

COURSE PROGRESS

QuizzesStatus

Accreditations

Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

Associates & Partners

Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo