Learn the Revision total Knee replacement: Second-stage with distal femoral EPR (Implantcast MUTARS MK) and EPORE collar and tibial cone surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Revision total Knee replacement: Second-stage with distal femoral EPR (Implantcast MUTARS MK) and EPORE collar and tibial cone surgical procedure.
Increasing numbers of primary and revision knee replacements are being performed which inevitably lead to more prosthetic joint infections (PJI) presenting to specialist PJI multi-disciplinary teams. Infection is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty and not only the most common cause for early failure of joint replacements but also the most common cause for failure of revision knee replacements at any time.
The treatment of prosthetic joint infection typically requires surgery involving explant of the infected prosthesis, radical debridement and then either immediate reimplantation or use of an antibiotic loaded cement spacer and delayed reimplantation (a two-stage revision, as in this case). Alternative strategies include debridement and implant retention with modular exchange (indicated in acute PJI) and single-stage revision (considered in infected primary arthroplasty implants, sensitive organisms and without soft-tissue defects requiring plastic surgery). There is endless debate about selecting the correct option for each case, the decision is multi-factorial and probably best decided in specialist PJI multi-disciplinary meetings.
Dependent upon the medical condition of the patient, repeat two-stage revision for re-infected knee replacements has proven to be possible, although in immunocompromised hosts with poor soft-tissues, amputation should be considered. These limb-salvage procedures are challenging for numerous reasons. Orthopaedically dealing with segmental bone loss and poor residual bone stock means the choice of prosthesis is crucial and the Implantcast modular limb-salvage system has anti-infective silver, porous EPORE cones and EPORE collar and significant on-table flexibility which helps overcome some of these reconstructive challenges.
The outcomes however of repeat two-stage revision are not widely described; our own hospital data suggests that failure due to recurrent infection after 2 years can be as high as 50%, compared to 10% in primary two-stage revisions of infected primary knee replacements, so proceeding must be a carefully considered and consented intervention. Failure to control PJI may lead to further surgery, antibiotic suppression or amputation.
Here I present a challenging case of reconstruction of an infected revision knee replacement, which underwent a two-stage revision using a porous tibial cone for severe bone loss and a silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement to manage segmental bone loss.
Readers will also find the following related OrthOracle surgical techniques of interest:
00:00
