Percutaneous fixation of Tongue-type calcaneal fracture


Subscribe to get full access to this operation and the extensive Foot Surgery Atlas.


Learn the Percutaneous fixation of Tongue-type calcaneal fracture surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Percutaneous fixation of Tongue-type calcaneal fracture surgical procedure.

Calcaneal fractures account for 1-2% of all fractures.  They generally following high energy mechanisms, most commonly falls from height or road traffic accidents.  The ‘rule of 10’ is useful when assessing these injuries, approximately 10% are bilateral, 10% open injuries and 10% associated with spinal injuries- usually thoracic-lumbar burst fractures.

They are in the main very significant injuries when intra-articular in nature, and require a clear understanding of the fracture anatomy, and patient factors (most importantly compliance and avoidance of smoking) as well as what can be realistically achieved with operative techniques, when forming an opinion on how to manage.

Controversy surrounds their management, in particular whether open reduction and internal fixation is ever warranted, given a not inconsequential incidence of  complications related to open approaches described in some series, such as wound breakdown, deep infection and pain syndromes related to cutaneous nerve compromise.  This has led to the development of less invasive techniques to reconstruct calcaneal fractures including sinus tarsi approaches and percutaneous techniques.

Overall tongue type calcaneal fractures tend to have a more favourable prognosis when compared to articular depression patterns and perhaps not surprisingly treating these injuries with percutaneous techniques also offers advantage. A recent retrospective cohort study by Quirine showed a lower incidence of wound problems and deep infection when tongue type fractures are managed with percutaneous compared to open techniques.

In essence the technique was first described by Peter Essex-Lopresti, one of the Worlds first dedicated Orthopaedic trauma Surgeons. He practiced at the Birmingham Accident Hospital, the Worlds first dedicated trauma centre, before dying at the tragically young age of 35. His work was based on observations made treating the Sixth British Airborne Division, in World War II, and is a significant landmark in improving the lives of patients with these injuries.   In addition to describing the patterns of calcaneal fractures and the percutaneous technique for fixation of tongue type fractures his paper also describes a sinus tarsi approach to articular depression fractures.

The UK heel fracture trial and its accompanying headline “Calcaneal fractures: surgery provides no benefits” in the British Medical Journal(BMJ) caused significant controversy with its assertion that open reduction and internal fixation should not be recommended for displaced intra-articular fractures.  The debate over this paper continues but it is certainly true that newer techniques and implants continue to develop which avoid the need for the use traditional open surgery, and are associated with a lower immediate incidence of complications.

It is also true that these fractures should be managed by surgeons and units used to dealing with large volumes of these injuries. This has been recognised for some time, and indeed was specifically reported on in 2008 by Poeze, and this is really only common sense. The median number of operations per surgeon in the BMJ study was 2 and this itself may be related to the high rate of complications, specifically a 19% infection rate, which any surgeon would deem unacceptable.

As with many aspects of complex trauma rather than didactically deciding on treatment based on a simple radiological review the decision making as to the best treatment of an individual patient relies on careful examination of the injured limb, study of the X-rays and scans and a detailed discussion with the patient as to the risks and benefits of each treatment for them in light of other factors such as smoking or medical co-morbidities. Unfortunately this patient-centred process does not lend itself to an RCT.

Readers will also find of interest the following related OrthOracle techniques:

Calcaneal fracture fixation : Internal fixation of sustentaculum tali fracture

Calcaneal fracture fixation: Extended lateral approach and locking plate fixation


Quirine M J van der Vliet 1 , Jeffrey M Potter 2 , Thirza A Esselink 3 , Roderick M Houwert 4 , Falco Hietbrink 4 , Luke P H Leenen 5 , Marilyn Heng.   Open Versus Closed Operative Treatment for Tongue-Type Calcaneal Fractures: Case Series and Literature Review.  J Foot Ankle Surg  . Mar-Apr 2020;59(2):264-268. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.02.006.

Poetze M, Verbruggen J, Brink P. The relationship between the outcome of operatively treated calcaneal fractures and institutional fracture load: A systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am). 2008. 1013-20.

Griffin D, Parsons N, Shaw E, Kulikov Y, Hutchinson C, Thorogood M, Lamb S. Operative versus non-operative treatment for closed, displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: randomised, controlled trial. The British Medical Journal. 2nd August 2014.

Author:Paul Fenton FRCS (Tr & Orth)

Institution: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

  • Each operation and the questions associated become a named course in the CPD section
  • The operative technique itself is read as a lesson as is any company implant information if this is being assessed.
  • You’ll need to tick the box to confirm this has been done and can do this immediately if you have already read the op tech.
  • The vast majority of operations have a 10-15 MCQ quiz covering all aspects of the decision making and the technique
  • There are four possible answers of which one is correct (or on occasion more correct) than the others.
  • There are additional quiz modules on the surgical steps, the implants and problem cases being added continually
  • The course is completed once all the lessons are read and quizzes submitted and passed.
  • On successful completion of each quiz you will receive validated CPD points that add to the certificate in your CPD folder.
  • Your dashboard also will contain a record of the time you have spent logged onto and using the site.
  • The timer suspends after 5 minutes though if there is no activity.
  • When you restart you will resume at the same point in the module.
  • Once you have completed each quiz you will need to feedback on the module first then click “submit” and your paper will be marked.
    The pass mark is 75%.
  • If you fall below this level you will be directed back to re-read the slides where you’ve tripped up.
  • Once these have been read you can re-do just the questions you failed on.
  • Once you have passed the quiz you can return at a future stage & resit .

CPD Points:

  • Operation Quiz – 1 CPD point
  • Surgical steps Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
  • Implants Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
  • Problem case Quiz – 1/2 CPD point

One CPD point equates to one hour of academic activity


Welcome to the Professional Development question section. The objective of taking these tests is to demonstrate that you have understood all aspects of the assessment and management of patients requiring surgical intevention. On successful completion you will receive a certificate accredited by both the Royal College of Surgeons of both England and Edinburgh as well as the British Orthopaedic Association.

Our content is designed for both Surgeons in independent practice and Surgeons in training.


  • Did you find this technique helpful?
  • YesNo

Lessons Status


Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

Associates & Partners

Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo