L5/S1 Anterior Interbody Lumbar Fusion [Globus INDEPENDENCE MIS®] surgical technique
Subscribe to get full access to this operation and the extensive Spine Surgery Atlas.
Learn the L5/S1 Anterior Interbody Lumbar Fusion [Globus INDEPENDENCE MIS®] surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the L5/S1 Anterior Interbody Lumbar Fusion [Globus INDEPENDENCE MIS®] surgical procedure.
Anterior approaches for spine operations have increased in popularity of late but they are in no way a new concept. The Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) was first described in 1932 for the treatment of spondylolisthesis. It has the longest history of use of the various interbody fusion techniques.
This is a case of a lady in her mid thirties presenting with a short history (12 months) of both low back pain and bilateral buttock / radicular leg pain (in keeping with a L5 distribution). Imaging demonstrated a L5/S1 low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. She had failed non-operative management (regular analgesia & physiotherapy). She had been seen by the pain team prior to referral and underwent bilateral L5 root sterioid and Local anaesthetic injections which led to a temporary improvement in symptoms.
In the most part, regardless of presenting symptoms or imaging, the treatment for Isthmic spondylolisthesis is non operative becasue lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are often identified in the course of clinical evaluation of patients with low back pain. Spondylolysis commonly occurs in the population and progression to symptomatic spondylolisthesis is rare. Both spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are prevalent in the general population, including a relatively high percentage of asymptomatic individuals; therefore, the relationship between these conditions and clinically significant low back pain is not always clear.
Terminology: Spondylolysis refers to an acquired anatomic defect in the vertebral pars interarticularis and is most commonly observed in the lowest lumbar vertebrae.
Spondylolisthesis means slipping of one spine vertebra on another. It is derived from the Greek words Spondylo, meaning vertebra, and Olisthesis (also known as the etymologically less correct listhesis), meaning slipping or sliding.
The term Spondylolisthesis describes what is seen (slip of one spine vertebra on another), but not what causes it. Spondylolysis is one possible cause and termed isthmic.
Spondylolisthesis has several aetiologies. Wiltse-Newman classified the cause into 5 sub-catagories;
Type I: Dysplatic (secondary to congenical abnormalities of lumbosacral articulation).
Type IIa: Isthmic pars fatigue fracture.
Type IIb: Isthmic pars elongation due to multiple healed stress fractures.
Type IIc Isthmic pars acute fracture.
Type III Degenerative: Facet instability without pars fracture.
Type IV Traumatic: acute traumatic posterior arch fracture (other than pars).
Type V Neoplastic: pathological destruction of pars.
This case is of a patient presenting with an L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis therefore further discussions will center on this pathology.
The incidence of lumbar spondylolysis is broadly estimated to be approximately 6% in the general population but the incidence varies considerably according to ethnicity and sex. Spondylolysis is more common in the Eskimo population with an incidence as high as 50% reported. Most studies report the incidence higher in males than in females. Several authors have reported a hereditary predisposition, citing a high rate of occurrence among family members.
The incidence is increased in young athletes, especially in those involved in sports requiring repetitive flexion/extension and/or hyperextension (fast-bowl cricketers, weightlifters and gymnasts) and studies have reported the incidence of spondylolysis to be as high as 23-63% in those engaging in certain sporting activities.
The pathogenesis of lumbar spondylolysis remains controversial. Originally spondylolysis was considered to arise from a congenital failure of fusion of two ossification centres or hyper-flexion injury at birth, but spondylolysis has not been reported in foetuses or babies at birth.
The most probable mechanism of lumbar spondylolysis is multifactoral; but results in a stress fracture occurring through a congenitally weak or dysplastic pars interarticularis.
Approximately 80-85% of spondylolysis occurs at L5/S1. This is likely due to forces in the lumbar spine being greatest at these levels and the facet being more coronal in orientation.
As stated, non-operative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis is preferential; however, a number of surgical treatment approaches exist should conservative management fail.
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is one such surgery indicated for isthmic spondylolisthesis (and a range of other spinal pathologies). When compared with posterior fusion techniques, ALIF potentially allows for superior interbody column support, fusion rates, restoration of sagittal balance and restoration of the disc and foraminal height.
INDEPENDENCE MIS® is an integrated lumbar plate-spacer (thus avoiding need for routine anterior plating or augmented posterior fixation).
Standalone ALIF use is widely documented in the literature. Benefits of standalone ALIF include the ability to avoid posterior muscle damage and epidural fibrosis (from posterior neural decompression). The ALIF, by inserting a large anterior spacer, allows indirect decompression of the exiting L5 nerve roots by increasing the height of the foramen.
Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend use of standalone ALIF in treating this specific pathology (grade I lytic L5/S1 spondylolisthesis) and I am clear with patients that although I do not routinely instrument posteriorly, I closely monitor them post operatively and if I believe there is cage subsidence or evidence of movement, I will augment their fixation.
Author: Neil Upadhyay FRCS.
Institution: The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Bristol, UK.
- Each operation and the questions associated become a named course in the CPD section
- The operative technique itself is read as a lesson as is any company implant information if this is being assessed.
- You’ll need to tick the box to confirm this has been done and can do this immediately if you have already read the op tech.
- The vast majority of operations have a 10-15 MCQ quiz covering all aspects of the decision making and the technique
- There are four possible answers of which one is correct (or on occasion more correct) than the others.
- There are additional quiz modules on the surgical steps, the implants and problem cases being added continually
- The course is completed once all the lessons are read and quizzes submitted and passed.
- On successful completion of each quiz you will receive validated CPD points that add to the certificate in your CPD folder.
- Your dashboard also will contain a record of the time you have spent logged onto and using the site.
- The timer suspends after 5 minutes though if there is no activity.
- When you restart you will resume at the same point in the module.
- Once you have completed each quiz you will need to feedback on the module first then click “submit” and your paper will be marked.
The pass mark is 75%.
- If you fall below this level you will be directed back to re-read the slides where you’ve tripped up.
- Once these have been read you can re-do just the questions you failed on.
- Once you have passed the quiz you can return at a future stage & resit .
- Operation Quiz – 1 CPD point
- Surgical steps Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
- Implants Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
- Problem case Quiz – 1/2 CPD point
One CPD point equates to one hour of academic activity
Welcome to the Professional Development question section. The objective of taking these tests is to demonstrate that you have understood all aspects of the assessment and management of patients requiring surgical intevention. On successful completion you will receive a certificate accredited by both the Royal College of Surgeons of both England and Edinburgh as well as the British Orthopaedic Association.
Our content is designed for both Surgeons in independent practice and Surgeons in training.