Second stage revision total hip replacement to proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for infection using MUTARS proximal femoral endoprosthesis (Implantcast)


Subscribe to get full access to this operation and the extensive Hip Surgery Atlas.


Learn the Second stage revision total hip replacement to proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for infection using MUTARS proximal femoral endoprosthesis (Implantcast) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Second stage revision total hip replacement to proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for infection using MUTARS proximal femoral endoprosthesis (Implantcast) surgical procedure.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of prosthetic joint replacement, accounting for 13.8% of 15,923 of re-revision total hip arthroplasties performed in the UK in 2018, as detailed in the 16th annual National Joint registry report. More common indications for revision surgery include aseptic loosening (43.5%), pain (16.9%), instability (14.4%), osteolysis (14%), and other important but less common indications for re-revision include implant wear (12.6%) and periprosthetic fracture (10.1%). Both instability and infection are much more common indications for a second revision than first revision hip replacement, highlighting the increased risk of instability and infection following the first revision of a hip replacement compared to that of primary hip replacement


Surgical management involves identification of the infecting pathogens and optimisation of the host prior to major surgery, which may involve debridement and implant retention, or a single or two-staged revision procedure. Staged revision surgery remains the gold standard of care for multiply revised infected hip replacements. At the first stage the prosthetic components are explanted and the involved soft-tissues are radically debrided. The joint is temporarily stabilised with either an articulating cement spacer, as in this case, or non-articulating spacer for approximately three months. At the second stage, following repeat debridement, the joint is reconstructed.

To minimise the risk of PJI relapse I prefer a silver coated modular proximal femoral endoprosthesis with cemented medullary stems (MUTARS, Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany). To minimise the risk of acetabular failure due to aseptic loosening I use a trabecular metal revision system (Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System, TMARS, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, US) which allows the use of a full range of liners, augments, cages to address almost all acetabular defects. To minimise the risk of dislocation I have chosen a dual-mobility articulation in this case.

Readers will also find the following techniques of interest:

Revision Total Hip replacement: Stryker custom acetabulum and SERF Dual mobility Hip (De Puy)

Revision Total Hip replacement: Direct exchange Link MP revision stem for periprosthetic fracture

Total Hip replacement(2 stage revision): Combined intra-pelvic and extended trochanteric osteotomy approach

Total Hip replacement (revision): Direct exchange to Rimfit socket (Stryker) with ‘X-change’ Rim-Mesh (Stryker) and impaction bone grafting

I am grateful to Mr Mike Parry FRCS (Tr & Orth) for the images used in this technique.

Author:Jonathan Stevenson FRCS (TR & Orth)

Institution: Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK

  • Each operation and the questions associated become a named course in the CPD section
  • The operative technique itself is read as a lesson as is any company implant information if this is being assessed.
  • You’ll need to tick the box to confirm this has been done and can do this immediately if you have already read the op tech.
  • The vast majority of operations have a 10-15 MCQ quiz covering all aspects of the decision making and the technique
  • There are four possible answers of which one is correct (or on occasion more correct) than the others.
  • There are additional quiz modules on the surgical steps, the implants and problem cases being added continually
  • The course is completed once all the lessons are read and quizzes submitted and passed.
  • On successful completion of each quiz you will receive validated CPD points that add to the certificate in your CPD folder.
  • Your dashboard also will contain a record of the time you have spent logged onto and using the site.
  • The timer suspends after 5 minutes though if there is no activity.
  • When you restart you will resume at the same point in the module.
  • Once you have completed each quiz you will need to feedback on the module first then click “submit” and your paper will be marked.
    The pass mark is 75%.
  • If you fall below this level you will be directed back to re-read the slides where you’ve tripped up.
  • Once these have been read you can re-do just the questions you failed on.
  • Once you have passed the quiz you can return at a future stage & resit .

CPD Points:

  • Operation Quiz – 1 CPD point
  • Surgical steps Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
  • Implants Quiz – 1/4 CPD point
  • Problem case Quiz – 1/2 CPD point

One CPD point equates to one hour of academic activity


Welcome to the Professional Development question section. The objective of taking these tests is to demonstrate that you have understood all aspects of the assessment and management of patients requiring surgical intevention. On successful completion you will receive a certificate accredited by both the Royal College of Surgeons of both England and Edinburgh as well as the British Orthopaedic Association.

Our content is designed for both Surgeons in independent practice and Surgeons in training.


  • Did you find this technique helpful?
  • YesNo

Lessons Status


Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

Associates & Partners

Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo